Why do teachers cheat on standardized tests, drug dealers live with their parents, and why did crime suddenly drop in the 1990s? According to Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the answer lies not in morality or coincidence, but in incentives. The book delves into behavioral science, illustrating how individuals often respond to these incentives in unexpected ways.

Incentives are described as rewards or benefits designed to motivate a person to take a specific action or change their behavior. Levitt and Dubner argue that various types of incentives-economic, social, and moral-profoundly influence human behavior, frequently prompting individuals to act in ways that defy simplistic interpretations.

A compelling illustration of how economic incentives shape behavior is the phenomenon of teachers cheating in schools. Levitt explains that the introduction of standardized testing encouraged teachers to secure high scores. Achieving high scores led to increased job security for teachers, more funding for schools, and potential bonuses. This scenario motivated some teachers to alter students‘ answers to ensure better results. Importantly, Levitt does not label these teachers as inherently bad individuals; rather, he highlights that the incentive structure, where high scores were rewarded and risks were minimal, fostered an environment conducive to cheating.

This concept is a central theme in *Freakonomics*: many people’s actions are driven more by incentives than by intentions. Beyond education, Levitt applies incentive-driven logic to the analysis of crime. He posits that declines in crime rates are influenced by changes in incentives, such as increased likelihood of punishment or diminished benefits for criminal behavior. Criminals are also human beings reacting to incentives, exemplified by the connection between legalized abortion and decreasing crime rates. This perspective suggests that crime should be viewed through an economic and social lens, rather than merely a legal or moral one.

In addition to economic incentives, Levitt discusses social and moral incentives, such as shame and reputation. A well-known example he cites is the daycare scenario, where fines were imposed on parents who picked up their children late. Rather than reducing tardiness, the fines paradoxically increased it, as parents began to view the fee as a mere cost rather than a punishment.

In conclusion, Freakonomics demonstrates that human behavior is neither random nor irrational; it is significantly influenced by incentives. Through case studies in education, crime, and human behavior, Levitt reveals that people respond to rewards or consequences regardless of moral expectations. Policies, schools, and laws are often designed based on a system of rewards for positive behaviors. By understanding the impact of incentives, we can create systems that encourage desirable behaviors, such as honesty, integrity, and success, rather than unintentionally rewarding negative actions.

<Connor Jung 트로이 고교 9학년>